top of page

Jury Acquits; Judge sentences anyway

  • attyrjr
  • Oct 22, 2014
  • 1 min read

The United States Surpreme Court denied a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari, letting stand sentences of fifteen, sixteen, and nineteen years respectively imposed on three defendants convicted of distributing "very small amounts of crack cocaine". The sentencing Guidelines would have provided for sentences between two and five years, except that the trial judge found that the defendants had also committed the crime of "conspiracy to distribute drugs." He therefore calculated much higher sentencing Guidelines. Not only had the defendants not been convicted of conspiracy, they had actually been acquitted of it by the jury. Justice Scalia wrote a dissent, joined by Justice Thomas and Justice Ginsburg.

 
 
 

Comments


Featured Posts
Search By Tags
Recent Posts
Follow Us
  • Facebook Basic Square
  • Twitter Basic Square
  • Google+ Basic Square
Archive

© 2014 by Russell J. Redgate.

Proudly created with Wix.com

DISCLAIMER: In accordance with the rules established by the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, this website must be labeled "advertising."  It is designed to provide general information and should not be construed as legal advice, or legal opinion on any specific facts or circumstances.  The information this site contains should not be construed as legal advice or the offering of legal advice outside the context of an attorney-client relationship.

bottom of page